Key result
Remote technical support via Heart Connect completes 97% of CIED follow-ups without on-site assistance.
Why the study?
Industry-employed allied professionals assist physicians with CIED follow-up, but preliminary clinical experience using the Heart Connect remote data-sharing and display-sharing application required evaluation.
Is remote technical support using a data-sharing application feasible and effective during cardiac implantable electronic device follow-up?
Observational (n=208)
Yes
Is remote technical support using a data-sharing application feasible and effective during cardiac implantable electronic device follow-up?
Remote technical support using a data-sharing application is highly feasible and effective for CIED follow-up, offering a viable alternative to on-site technical assistance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports remote CIED technical assistance in selected settings; leaves open generalizability and need for randomized outcome trials.
Industry-employed allied professionals (IEAPs) provide technical assistance to physicians during cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, programming, troubleshooting, and follow-up. The Heart Connect™ application (Boston Scientific Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA) is a data-sharing system that enables remote access and display sharing of the CIED Programmer. This report aims to describe the preliminary experience of remote IEAP support through the application during CIED follow-up in clinical practice. The application was downloaded on the programmer, and network connections were established and tested at six Italian centers. Staff members were trained and online meetings were scheduled with IEAPs during consecutive CIED follow-up visits. Data and user feedback were collected. A total of 20 operators received training, and online meetings were conducted during 208 patient visits. Of these, 202 (97%) visits were successfully completed with remote support, without the need for additional medical or technical assistance. The connection quality, audio, and video were rated as good or excellent in ≥95% of sessions. The average duration of online meetings ranged from 6-16 min, depending on the supported session type. Comprehensive CIED checks and tests were performed during the visits, leading to the identification of relevant conditions or programming changes in 29% of visits. All operators found the application to be user-friendly and effective. Overall, satisfaction with the remote support service was rated high in 80% of responses, particularly for managing unscheduled CIED follow-up visits. In conclusion, remote support during CIED follow-up appears to be feasible, effective, and well accepted. It offers a viable alternative to traditional on-site IEAP support for both scheduled and unscheduled follow-up visits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bianchi et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) follow-up (n=208). Remote technical support using Heart Connect™ application was evaluated on Successful completion of visits with remote support without additional medical or technical assistance. Remote technical support using the Heart Connect application successfully completed 97% (202/208) of CIED follow-up visits without needing additional on-site assistance.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: