Why the study?
Technical support for ICD and CRT-D procedures is often limited by the availability and costs of field clinical specialist bioengineers.
Does remote technical support by a field clinical specialist via an internet-based telemedicine platform enable feasible and safe ICD/CRT-D implantation compared to standard on-site engineer support in patients undergoing de novo device implantation?
Does remote technical support by a field clinical specialist via an internet-based telemedicine platform enable feasible and safe ICD/CRT-D implantation compared to standard on-site engineer support in patients undergoing de novo device implantation?
Remotely guided ICD and CRT-D implantation using a real-time audio-visual telemedicine platform is feasible and safe, achieving 100% procedural success and shorter EP lab occupancy times without on-site field clinical specialist presence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote support may ease access and costs for device implants; leaves open safety and efficacy versus on-site specialists.
Background In the electrophysiologic (EP) lab, technical support for implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) procedures is often limited by the availability and costs of field clinical specialist (FCS) bioengineers. Methods This study explores the viability of using remote support through an internet-based platform for ICD and CRT-D implantation procedures, aiming to enhance efficiency and overcome geographical or pandemic-related barriers. After preclinical phases, thirty patients underwent ICD/CRT-D guided either remotely or with on-site FCS implantation at two primary cardiac care centers, with ten procedures guided remotely and twenty cases with on-site FCS. Results All procedures in both study arms were successfully completed (100% of cases). Procedural time was shorter in the telemedicine group ( P = 0.031). Although fluoroscopic time was slightly reduced in the remote guided group, the difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.5). No major adverse events occurred. Conclusion The study demonstrates the feasibility of remotely supported ICD and CRT-D implantation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curcio et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: