Key result
CHD Transition Clinic linked to ~72% lower lost to follow-up rate vs control.
Why the study?
Children with congenital heart disease need lifelong care, but many experience gaps in care around the age of transition to adult-oriented care with associated comorbidity.
Does a transition clinic intervention improve follow-up rates in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease?
Cohort (n=53)
Does a transition clinic intervention improve follow-up rates in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.3% vs 25.9%
p-value: p=< 0.01
A dedicated transition clinic intervention significantly reduces the rate of loss to follow-up among adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease.
May support transition clinic adoption in CHD care; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) require lifelong cardiology follow-up. Many experience gaps in care around the age of transition to adult-oriented care with associated comorbidity. We describe the impact of a clinic-based intervention on follow-up rates in this high-risk population. METHODS: Patients ≥11 years seen in a paediatric outpatient CHD Transition Clinic completed self-assessment questionnaires, underwent focused teaching, and were followed on a clinic registry with assessment of care continuation. The cohort "lost to follow-up" rate, defined as absence from care at least 6 months beyond the recommended timeframe, was compared with a control group. Secondary outcomes included questionnaire scores and adult cardiology referral trends. RESULTS: Over 26 months, 53 participants completed an initial Transition Clinic visit; 43% (23/53) underwent a second visit. Median participant age was 18.0 years (interquartile range 16.0, 22.0). The cohort's "lost to follow-up" rate was 7.3%, which was significantly lower than the control rate (25.9%, p < 0.01). Multivariable regression analyses demonstrated clinic participation as the only factor independently associated with follow-up rates (p = 0.048). Transition readiness was associated with older age (p = 0.01) but not sex, univentricular heart, interventional history, or surgical complexity. One-third of adult participants transferred to adult care. CONCLUSIONS: A CHD Transition Clinic intervention can improve follow-up rates in adolescents and young adults. Age is an important factor in transition readiness, and retention of adults in paediatric care appears multi-factorial. We postulate that serial assessments of self-management, focused education, and registry utilisation may improve patient outcomes by reducing lapses in care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaydos et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Congenital heart disease (n=53). CHD Transition Clinic intervention vs. Control group was evaluated on Lost to follow-up rate (absence from care ≥6 months beyond recommended timeframe) (p=< 0.01). A CHD Transition Clinic intervention significantly reduced the lost to follow-up rate compared to a control group (7.3% vs 25.9%, p < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: