Key result
Echo RVSP strongly correlates with invasive RVSP in TR grades 1-4 but weakens in torrential TR.
Why the study?
The accuracy of echocardiographic RVSP estimation may be compromised in severe tricuspid regurgitation, prompting assessment of agreement with invasive RVSP using a 5-grade TR classification.
Does echocardiographic RVSP estimation accurately reflect invasive RVSP across different grades of tricuspid regurgitation severity?
Observational (n=454)
Does echocardiographic RVSP estimation accurately reflect invasive RVSP across different grades of tricuspid regurgitation severity?
Effect estimate: R = 0.70-0.87
p-value: p=<0.001
Echocardiographic RVSP estimation is accurate for ruling out pulmonary hypertension in TR grades 1-4, but its sensitivity decreases in torrential TR (grade 5), requiring a lower threshold for detection.
Echocardiographic RVSP may be less reliable in torrential TR; leaves open validation of adjusted thresholds before wider use.
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of echocardiographic right ventricular systolic pressure (eRVSP) estimation may be compromised in the context of severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). This study assessed the agreement between eRVSP and invasive RVSP (iRVSP) using the five-grade TR severity classification. METHODS: 742 patients who underwent same-day transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and right heart catheterization (RHC) we retrospectively screened. TR severity was graded from 1 to 5; all patients with TR grades 3-5 were referred for TEE-R screening. RESULTS: The final cohort included 454 patients. eRVSP and iRVSP demonstrated strong correlations in TR grades 1-4 (R = 0.70-0.87; all p < 0.001) whereas in TR-5 the association was moderate (R = 0.57). Limits of agreement were wide across all grades. The difference in right atrial pressure (ΔRAP) emerged as the sole independent predictor of Δ(e-iRVSP). An eRVSP threshold of 35 mmHg yielded high sensitivity (80-90 %) for pulmonary hypertension (pH) detection in TR grades 1-4, but sensitivity was reduced in TR-5 (54 %), improving to 71 % with a lower threshold of 30 mmHg. Within the TR 3-5 screening subgroup, eRVSP demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for identifying iRVSP >60 mmHg (AUC = 0.93). CONCLUSION: eRVSP provides reliable rule-out information for PH across TR grades 1-4. In torrential TR, the low sensitivity might be improved by applying a lower threshold may improve sensitivity. Importantly, eRVSP effectively identifies PH at thresholds relevant for excluding TEE-R eligibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arshad et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Tricuspid regurgitation (n=454). Echocardiographic right ventricular systolic pressure (eRVSP) vs. Invasive right ventricular systolic pressure (iRVSP) was evaluated on Agreement between eRVSP and iRVSP (R = 0.70-0.87, p=<0.001). Echocardiographic RVSP estimation strongly correlated with invasive RVSP in TR grades 1-4 (R=0.70-0.87, p<0.001), but correlation was only moderate in torrential TR grade 5 (R=0.57).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: