Key result
Echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure correlated well with invasive right heart catheterization in severe tricuspid regurgitation (r=0.85, P<0.001).
Why the study?
The accuracy of echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary artery pressure has been questioned in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.
Does a new echocardiographic algorithm improve the accuracy of estimating pulmonary arterial systolic pressure compared to simultaneous right heart catheterization in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Observational (n=48)
No
Does a new echocardiographic algorithm improve the accuracy of estimating pulmonary arterial systolic pressure compared to simultaneous right heart catheterization in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation?
Effect estimate: r = 0.85
p-value: p=<0.001
Incorporating additional echocardiographic parameters such as IVC collapsibility and hepatic vein flow reversal significantly improves the noninvasive estimation of pulmonary artery pressure in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.
May support noninvasive PASP estimation in severe TR; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background The accuracy of echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary artery pressure has been questioned in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of echocardiographic estimates of pulmonary artery pressure compared with simultaneous right heart catheterization (RHC) in patients with severe TR. Methods In this prospective observational study, a total of 48 patients with severe TR were enrolled between September 2021 and August 2024 at an experienced RHC center. Data were obtained by simultaneously measuring echocardiography and RHC parameters. The correlation between pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) measured by echocardiography and RHC was analyzed using Pearson correlation and Bland–Altman analysis. Results The median age was 71.5 years, and 26 (54.2%) of the patients were women. Forty‐three (89.6%) patients had secondary TR as the underlying pathogenesis. There was a good correlation ( r =0.85 as Pearson correlation, P <0.001) between PASP measurements obtained via echocardiography and RHC, with a bias of +1.3 mm Hg and 95% limits of agreement ranging from −12.8 to 15.5 mm Hg. Incorporating parameters such as inferior vena cava collapsibility of ≤20%, hepatic vein systolic flow reversal, and the V‐wave cutoff sign further stratified the estimated right atrial pressure to 10, 15, or 20 mm Hg in patients initially estimated to have a right atrial pressure of 15 mm Hg ( P <0.001). The use of these new criteria improved the correlation for PASP estimation by echocardiography compared with RHC ( r =0.90, P <0.001). Conclusions Echocardiography demonstrated good agreement with invasively measured PASP. Incorporating additional echocardiographic parameters significantly enhanced the accuracy of PASP estimation, suggesting a refined noninvasive diagnostic approach in severe TR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Severe tricuspid regurgitation (n=48). Echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary artery pressure vs. Right heart catheterization was evaluated on Correlation between pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) measured by echocardiography and right heart catheterization (r = 0.85, p=<0.001). Echocardiographic estimation of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure correlated well with invasive right heart catheterization in severe tricuspid regurgitation (r=0.85, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: