Key result
Telemedicine for HF reduces mortality and hospitalizations while improving quality of life despite mixed significance.
Why the study?
Telemedicine emerged as an alternative to usual outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic, prompting a systematic review of its effects on mortality, quality of life, and hospitalisation in vulnerable HF patients.
Does telemedicine reduce mortality and hospitalisation rate, and improve health-related quality of life in heart failure patients?
Systematic Review (n=21,006)
Does telemedicine reduce mortality and hospitalisation rate, and improve health-related quality of life in heart failure patients?
Telemedicine is a promising method to support heart failure patients, showing potential reductions in mortality and hospitalizations and improvements in quality of life.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports telemedicine integration in HF care to reduce mortality and hospitalizations; extends prior evidence by pooling 27 studies.
Background: Heart failure (HF) has been described as an emerging pandemic as its prevalence continues to rise with a growing and aging population. HF patients are more vulnerable to infections with higher risk of hospitalisation, morbidity, and mortality. During this COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has emerged as an alternative to usual out-patient care. This study aimed to systematically review available literature regarding the effect of telemedicine on mortality, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and hospitalisation rate of HF patients. Method: May 2022. Data from studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were collected and extracted. Included studies were critically appraised using suitable tools and extracted data were synthesized qualitatively. Results: A total of 27 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis with a total of 21,006 patients and sufficient level of bias. Reduction in the mortality rate, HF-related hospitalisation rate, and improvement in the HR-QoL were shown in most of the studies, although only some were statistically significant. Conclusions: The use of telemedicine is a promising and beneficial method for HF patients to acquire adequate health care services. Further studies in this field are needed, especially in developing countries and with standardized method, to provide better services and protections for HF patients. Telemonitoring and patient-centred partnership via interactive communication between healthcare team and patients is central to successful telemedicine implementation. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42021271540.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fatrin et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure (n=21,006). Telemedicine vs. usual out-patient care was evaluated on mortality, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), and hospitalisation rate. Telemedicine for heart failure patients (N=21,006 across 27 studies) reduced mortality and hospitalization rates and improved quality of life, though not all were statistically significant.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: