Why the study?
Does postextrasystolic potentiation alter the amplitude and timing of regional left ventricular wall motion in patients with ischaemic heart disease?
Does postextrasystolic potentiation alter the amplitude and timing of regional left ventricular wall motion in patients with ischaemic heart disease?
Postextrasystolic potentiation increases regional wall motion amplitude based on basal amplitude and volume changes, but does not correct timing abnormalities, challenging the concept of 'reversible asynergy'.
Challenges concept of reversible asynergy; leaves open clinical utility of postextrasystolic potentiation for regional wall motion assessment.
In order to investigate the effects of postextrasystolic potentiation on left ventricular wall motion, the left ventriculograms of 30 patients were digitised frame by frame and regional movement demonstrated by contour displays. Postextrasystolic potentiation caused significant increases in end-diastolic volume, ejection fraction, and peak ejection and filling rates. The amplitude of normally moving segments increased by 5.7 +/- 2.3 mm, regardless of initial amplitude. Hypokinetic segments moved normally if the initial amplitude was greater than 5 mm, and there was a reduced or absent response if 4 mm or less. Four specific abnormalities of timing of motion were studied during isovolumic contraction, early ejection, and isovolumic relaxation. Their timing and extent were all unaffected in postextrasystolic beats. These results thus give no evidence for the entity "reversible asynergy". Rather, they suggest that the response of local wall motion to postextrasystolic potentiation depends only on basal amplitude and increased volume change in postextrasystolic beats.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibson et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: