Why the study?
Is postextrasystolic potentiation dependent on increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume (Starling's law) in normal subjects?
Is postextrasystolic potentiation dependent on increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume (Starling's law) in normal subjects?
Postextrasystolic potentiation is independent of left ventricular end-diastolic volume in normal human hearts, indicating it is not driven by Starling's mechanism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests postextrasystolic potentiation is preload-independent in normal hearts; leaves open intrinsic mechanisms for prospective confirmation.
The cineangiograms of 26 normal subjects were analyzed to study the effect of Starling's mechanism on postextrasystolic potentiation. The end-diastolic volumes (single plane and biplane) of the left ventricle were similar in the regular sinus beat before an extrasystole and sequential sinus beats after an extrasystole. However, the ejection fraction, mean normalized systolic ejection rate, mean velocity of fiber shortening and long-axis shortening were consistently larger in the first sinus beat after an extrasystole. We conclude that postextrasystolic potentiation is independent of left ventricular end-diastolic volume in normal human hearts and the compensatory pause after an extrasystole does not result in increased end-diastolic volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sung et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: