This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Social movement scholarship has focused primarily on public rhetoric and single-issue movements. This focus has led to limited understanding of the function of “protected enclaves” within movement-building, at the same time that we know little about coalition-building. This article fills this gap in the literature by examining how activists in coalition interpret external rhetoric within protected enclaves. Using data collected during a field research project, this essay shows how rhetoric functions to facilitate coalition-building between a queer rights and a migrant rights organization by demonstrating how activists interpret rhetoric from 3 primary sources: media, legislation and policy, and law enforcement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karma R. Chávez (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: