Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
= 8.70 years) were assigned randomly to the three training groups: (a) metacognitive training of basic EF processes (meta-EF), (b) training of basic EF processes (basic-EF), and (c) active controls (active control). They underwent 16 training sessions over the course of 2 months. No effects of EF and/or metacognitive training were found for academic outcomes. However, both meta-EF and basic-EF groups demonstrated greater gains than the active control group on proactive control engagement and WM, suggesting that EF training promotes a shift to more mature ways of engaging EF. Our findings suggest minimal near- and far-transfer effects of metacognitive training but highlight that proactive engagement of EF can be promoted through EF training in children. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kubota et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: