Key result
Tripolar Laplacian EGM is linked to ~90% lower ventricular FFP amplitude and less noise than bipolar.
Why the study?
The usefulness of tripolar Laplacian electrograms in cardiac electrophysiology was unknown.
Does tripolar Laplacian electrogram improve signal quality compared to bipolar electrogram in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=22)
Does tripolar Laplacian electrogram improve signal quality compared to bipolar electrogram in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.04% vs 0.4%
p-value: p=0.01
Tripolar Laplacian electrograms provide superior noise reduction and far-field potential rejection compared to standard bipolar electrograms, making them useful for analyzing low-voltage areas during atrial fibrillation ablation.
May aid low-voltage mapping in AF ablation; leaves open effects on procedural success in prospective trials.
Background The usefulness of tripolar Laplacian electrogram (TLE) in cardiac electrophysiology is unknown. Objective We investigated the difference in the morphology, voltage amplitude, noise level, and far‐field potential (FFP) between TLE and bipolar electrogram (BE). Methods Twenty‐two patients who underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation were analyzed. TLE and BE were simultaneously obtained using 64‐electrode basket catheters during atrial tachycardia or pacing. Local electrograms (EGMs) were analyzed at the locations of three activation patterns: normal conduction, wavefront collision, and slow conduction (SC). In addition, each activation pattern was analyzed at two different wavefront angles: horizontal and vertical, respectively. The voltage amplitude, duration, morphology, and deflection number were compared. The noise level and FFP amplitude were also analyzed. Results With all activation patterns and wavefront angles, the voltage amplitude was significantly lower on TLE than on BE, and the mean amplitude ratio of TLE/BE was 0.75. The duration and deflection number of EGM were comparable. The ventricular FFP amplitude was lower on TLE than on BE (0.04 mV vs. 0.40 mV, p = .01). TLE also had less noise than BE (0.08 mV vs. 0.15 mV, p = .02), with a noise reduction of 47%. At the SC area, low‐voltage EGMs below the mean noise levels were more common with BE than with TLE (29% vs. 8%, p = .04). Conclusion TLE has a lower voltage amplitude than BE for all activation patterns and wavefront angles, and it removes more noise and FFPs. TLE is useful for analyzing low‐voltage and fractionated EGMs regardless of the wavefront angle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=22). Tripolar Laplacian electrogram (TLE) vs. Bipolar electrogram (BE) was evaluated on Ventricular far-field potential (FFP) amplitude (mV) (p=0.01). Tripolar Laplacian electrogram had lower ventricular far-field potential amplitude (0.04 mV vs 0.40 mV, p=0.01) and less noise (0.08 mV vs 0.15 mV, p=0.02) compared to bipolar electrogram.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: