Key result
Discordantly high remnant cholesterol relative to LDL-C is linked to ~19% greater arterial stiffness progression.
Why the study?
Cross-sectional studies show remnant cholesterol is linked to arterial stiffness, but its association and discordance with LDL-C regarding arterial stiffness progression required evaluation.
Does discordantly high remnant cholesterol compared to LDL-C predict arterial stiffness progression?
Cohort (n=10,507)
Does discordantly high remnant cholesterol compared to LDL-C predict arterial stiffness progression?
Effect estimate: OR 1.19 (95% CI 1.06-1.33)
Discordantly high remnant cholesterol relative to LDL-C is a significant predictor of arterial stiffness progression, highlighting its potential as a marker for future coronary artery disease risk.
May support remnant cholesterol discordance for arterial stiffness risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies have shown that remnant cholesterol (RC) was associated with arterial stiffness. The present study evaluated the association of RC and the discordance between RC and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with arterial stiffness progression. METHODS: Data were derived from the Kailuan study. RC was calculated as total cholesterol - high-density lipoprotein cholesterol - LDL-C. Discordant RC with LDL-C were defined by residuals, cutoff points, and median values. Arterial stiffness progression was assessed by the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) change, baPWV change rate, and increase/persistently high baPWV. Multivariable linear regression models and logistic regression models were used to explore the association of RC and discordant RC versus LDL-C with the arterial stiffness progression. RESULTS: A total of 10,507 participants were enrolled in this study, with the mean age of 50.8 ± 11.8 years, 60.9% (6,396) of male. Multivariable regression analyses showed that, each 1 mmol/L increase in the RC level was associated with a 12.80 cm/s increase in baPWV change, a 3.08 cm/s/year increase in the baPWV change rate, and 13% (95% CI, 1.05-1.21) of increase in the risk for increase in/persistently high baPWV. Discordant high RC was associated with a 13.65 cm/s increase in baPWV change and 19% (95% CI, 1.06-1.33) of increase in the risk for increase in/persistently high baPWV compared to those with concordant group. CONCLUSION: Discordantly high RC with LDL-C was associated with an increased risk of arterial stiffness progression. The findings demonstrated that RC may be an important marker of future coronary artery disease risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Arterial stiffness progression (n=10,507). Discordant high remnant cholesterol vs. Concordant remnant cholesterol and LDL-C was evaluated on Increase in/persistently high brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06-1.33). Discordantly high remnant cholesterol relative to LDL-C was associated with a 19% increased risk of arterial stiffness progression compared to concordant levels (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.06-1.33).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: