Key result
CES1 copy number variation (3 vs 2 copies: HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.77-1.45) and the rs3815583 SNP were not associated with cardiovascular or all-cause death in ACEI-treated patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Do CES1 gene variants (copy number variation or rs3815583 SNP) predict cardiovascular or all-cause death in ACEI-treated patients with congestive heart failure?
Cohort (n=491)
Do CES1 gene variants (copy number variation or rs3815583 SNP) predict cardiovascular or all-cause death in ACEI-treated patients with congestive heart failure?
Effect estimate: HR 1.06 (95% CI 0.77-1.45)
CES1 gene copy number variation and the rs3815583 SNP do not predict cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure treated with ACE inhibitors.
CES1 variants showed no mortality association in ACEI-treated HF; leaves open whether pharmacogenetic testing improves outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Most angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are prodrugs activated by carboxylesterase 1 (CES1). We investigated the prognostic importance of CES1 gene (CES1) copy number variation and the rs3815583 single-nucleotide polymorphism in CES1 among ACEI-treated patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). METHODS: Danish patients with chronic CHF enrolled in the previously reported Echocardiography and Heart Outcome Study were categorized according to their CES1 variants and followed up for up to 10 years. Risk for cardiovascular death and all-cause death was modeled by Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: A total of 491 ACEI-treated patients were included in the analyses. After a mean follow-up of 5.5 years, we found no difference in the risk for cardiovascular death and all-cause death between patients having three [hazard ratios (HRs) 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.45) and 1.16 (95% CI 0.88-1.52)] or four [HRs 0.88 (95% CI 0.39-2.01) and 1.37 (95% CI 0.74-2.54)] CES1 copies and those with two copies, respectively. Similarly, no difference in the risk for cardiovascular and all-cause death was found for patients heterozygous [HRs 0.91 (95% CI 0.70-1.19) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.69-1.12)] or homozygous [HRs 0.58 (95% CI 0.30-1.15) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.48-1.39)] for the rs3815583 minor allele versus patients homozygous for the major allele. The active promoter of CES1A2 and the rs71647871 single-nucleotide polymorphism minor allele were detected at very low frequencies. CONCLUSION: This study did not support the use of CES1 copy number variation or rs3815583 as a predictor of fatal outcomes in ACEI-treated patients with CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nelveg-Kristensen et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Congestive heart failure (n=491). CES1 gene variants (copy number variation and rs3815583 SNP) vs. 2 CES1 copies and homozygous major allele was evaluated on Cardiovascular death (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.45). CES1 copy number variation (3 vs 2 copies: HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.77-1.45) and the rs3815583 SNP were not associated with cardiovascular or all-cause death in ACEI-treated patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: