Key result
Repetitive pressure overload reduces murine LV stiffness ~79% vs single exposure but causes persistent myocardial injury.
Why the study?
Repetitive pressure overload leads to adaptive responses in swine, but whether mice develop similar responses to repetitive pressure overload remained undefined.
Does daily repetitive pressure overload induce adaptive remodeling and attenuate myocardial injury in mice compared to single pressure overload?
Does daily repetitive pressure overload induce adaptive remodeling and attenuate myocardial injury in mice compared to single pressure overload?
Repetitive pressure overload in mice induces eccentric remodeling, reduced chamber stiffness, and persistent myocardial injury, highlighting important species-specific differences compared to the adaptive response observed in swine.
Repetitive pressure overload may induce persistent injury without adaptive stiffness changes in mice; challenges swine-based remodeling consensus and leaves open human relevance.
Repetitive pressure overload (RPO) in swine leads to the rapid development of increased LV chamber stiffness, a preserved ejection fraction and the absence of anatomic hypertrophy which appears to protect the heart from chronic strain-induced injury. Murine hearts are more amenable to mechanistic approaches modifying specific molecular pathways but whether mice develop similar adaptive responses to RPO remains undefined. We hypothesized that repetitive pressure overload in mice would increase LV chamber stiffness and attenuate strain-induced myocardial injury, recapitulating key features of the swine model. We subjected mice to single (SPO, n=8) or daily repetitive pressure overload (RPO, n=6) using 30-minute phenylephrine infusions via a chronically implanted catheter. At baseline, LV end-diastolic pressure was increased after RPO compared with SPO (13 ± 2 mmHg vs. 6 ± 1 mmHg, p < 0.05), while ejection fraction remained preserved. During phenylephrine infusion, LV end-diastolic volume increased to a greater extent in RPO than in SPO mice (4.0 ± 0.5 µL/g vs. 2.4 ± 0.1 µL/g, p < 0.05). In contrast to the increased stiffness that develops in swine subjected to RPO, end-diastolic LV chamber stiffness decreased (EDPVR slope 5 ± 3 vs. 24 ± 4 mmHg/µL/g after SPO, p<0.05) along with a reduction in contractility (ESPVR 10±2 vs. 33±5 mmHg/µL/g after SPO, p<0.05). Markers of myocardial injury were increased following pressure overload, including cardiomyocyte apoptosis and circulating troponin I levels, with no attenuation following repetitive exposure. Thus, despite a preserved ejection fraction, repetitive pressure overload in mice results in ventricular dilation, reduced chamber stiffness, and persistent myocardial injury. These findings contrast with the adaptive response observed in swine and highlight important species-specific differences in myocardial remodeling in response to transient pressure overload.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lang et al. (2026) studied Pressure overload-induced myocardial remodeling (n=14). Daily repetitive pressure overload (RPO) vs. Single pressure overload (SPO) was evaluated on End-diastolic LV chamber stiffness (EDPVR slope in mmHg/µL/g) (p=<0.05). Repetitive pressure overload in mice decreased end-diastolic LV chamber stiffness compared to single exposure (EDPVR slope 5 vs 24 mmHg/µL/g, p<0.05) and caused persistent myocardial injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: