Adaptive Reductions in Left Ventricular Diastolic Compliance Protect the Heart From Stretch-Induced Stunning

Figures

• 

  Figure 1. RPO Elicits a Reduction in LV Compliance That Prevents Chamber Distension During an Acute Elevation in Afterload A 60-min intravenous infusion of phenylephrine (PE) elicited a similar increase in arterial systolic blood pressure (SBP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at the initial study (blue) and after 2 weeks of repetitive pressure overload (RPO) (purple). At the initial study, this was associated with an increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) that persisted after cessation of PE despite normalization of SBP and LVEDP. However, transient PE infusion no longer produced a significant increase in LVEDV when the study was repeated after 2 weeks of RPO, which was indicative of reduced LV compliance after RPO. Values are mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 versus baseline; †p < 0.05 versus initial.

• 

  Video Files 1A-1C: Example Left Ventricular Short-Axis Echocardiograms at the Initial Study Short-axis echocardiograms from the initial study demonstrate normal left ventricular systolic function at rest (arterial blood pressure (BP): 124/78 mmHg; Video 1A), followed by marked dilatation and systolic dysfunction during phenylephrine (PE) infusion (arterial BP: 216/155 mmHg; Video 1B) that persists following cessation of PE despite normalization of arterial BP (arterial BP: 125/86 mmHg; Video 1C).

• 

  Video Files 2A-2C: Example Left Ventricular Short-Axis Echocardiograms After 2-weeks of Repetitive Pressure Overload Short-axis echocardiograms from the same animal shown in Video Files 1A-1C obtained after 2-weeks of RPO demonstrate normal left ventricular systolic function at rest (arterial blood pressure (BP): 102/61 mmHg; Video 2A) as well as during (arterial BP: 230/154 mmHg; Video 2B) and after (arterial BP: 132/82 mmHg; Video 2C) phenylephrine (PE) infusion despite a similar arterial BP response to PE at both studies. *Note: All example echocardiograms were collected from the same animal subject.

• 

  Figure 3. RPO Produces Significant Cardiomyocyte Loss and Compensatory Cellular Hypertrophy of Remaining Myocytes Examples of periodic acid-Schiff−stained myocardial tissue sections from a normal control animal (left) and an animal subjected to RPO (right) illustrate the reduction in myocyte nuclear density and increase in myocyte diameter elicited by RPO. Although RPO did not elicit a change in total LV mass, the LV mass/LVEDV was increased compared with normal control animals (n = 20), which was indicative of concentric LV remodeling in the absence of overt anatomic hypertrophy in swine subjected to RPO. Values are mean ± SEM. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

• 

  Figure 4. Swine Subjected to RPO Exhibit Increased Interstitial Fibrosis Picrosirius red−stained tissue sections demonstrate a marked increase in interstitial collagen deposition (red areas) in myocardial samples from animals subjected to RPO compared with normal control swine. Values are mean ± SEM. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

• 

  Figure 5. RPO Reduces LV Diastolic Compliance (A) Example admittance catheter-derived LV pressure−volume loops at rest and during PE infusion demonstrate that swine subjected to 2 weeks of RPO exhibited a steeper end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship during elevations in afterload. (B) This was visualized via construction of 2-point diastolic pressure−volume curves and quantified via calculation of the ΔLVEDV/ΔLVEDP ratio during acute episodes of PE-induced pressure overload, which was significantly lower after RPO. Values are mean ± SEM. EDPVR = end-diastolic pressure-volume relationship; other abbreviations as in Figure 1.

• 

  Figure 6. RPO Elicits an Upward and Leftward Shift in the LV EDPVR (A) Example admittance catheter-derived LV pressure−volume loops during transient inferior vena cava occlusion show a steeper EDPVR after 2 weeks of RPO compared with normal control animals. (B) The upward and leftward shift of the EDPVR led to a higher LV diastolic chamber stiffness constant (β) in animals subjected to RPO compared with normal control swine. Values are mean ± SEM; n = 5/group. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 5.