Key result
Systolic (>25.40) and diastolic (>17.35) velocity dispersion indices identified ischemic heart failure with sensitivities of 91.7% and 86.7%, and specificities of 100% and 87.5%, respectively.
Why the study?
Tissue Doppler imaging quantifies LV function and detects subtle contractility alterations, but its utility and the role of mitral valve velocity dispersion index in differentiating ischemic from nonischemic heart failure needed evaluation.
Does Tissue Doppler imaging-derived velocity dispersion index differentiate ischemic from nonischemic etiologies in patients with symptomatic heart failure?
Observational (n=100)
Does Tissue Doppler imaging-derived velocity dispersion index differentiate ischemic from nonischemic etiologies in patients with symptomatic heart failure?
Tissue Doppler imaging-derived velocity dispersion index provides high diagnostic accuracy for differentiating ischemic from nonischemic etiologies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
May aid ischemic HF differentiation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echocardiography, an objective method for the quantification of left ventricular (LV) function, can detect subtle alterations in contractility both in rest and stress echocardiography. Aim: The study aims were to (1) compare TDI parameters in patients with heart failure (HF) of ischemic and nonischemic etiology, (2) to differentiate both subsets based on velocity dispersion index (VDI) at mitral valve, and (3) to identify parameters that help in identifying the ischemic etiology of HF. Materials and Methods: Patients with symptomatic HF (NYHA class ≥II; LV ejection fraction <40%) were included in the study. Patients with aortic and mitral valve diseases, prosthetic valves, and cor pulmonale were excluded from the study. All patients underwent coronary angiography after stabilization. A total of 100 patients admitted between May 2017 and October 2018 were enrolled. Results: The mean age of presentation was earlier in nonischemic group compared to that of ischemic group of HF (43.4 ± 10.91 vs. 54.06 ± 10.40; P = 0.001). No significant differences in the mitral inflow velocities by conventional Doppler were found. The mean mitral TDI velocities were lower in the nonischemic group compared to those of the ischemic group. Systolic VDI, V s' >25.40 (sensitivity 91.7% and specificity 100%), and diastolic VDI, V e' >17.35 (sensitivity 86.7% and specificity 87.5%), were associated with the probability of diagnosing the ischemic cause of HF. Conclusions: VDIs help in the differentiation of ischemic and nonischemic etiologies of HF compared to the conventional echocardiography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandeep et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Heart failure (ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy) (n=100). Tissue Doppler Echocardiography-Based Velocity Dispersion Index (VDI) vs. Conventional echocardiography was evaluated on Differentiation of ischemic and nonischemic etiologies of heart failure. Systolic (>25.40) and diastolic (>17.35) velocity dispersion indices identified ischemic heart failure with sensitivities of 91.7% and 86.7%, and specificities of 100% and 87.5%, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: