This paper argues that the language of rights cannot express distinctively ecofeminist insights into the treatment of nonhuman animals and the environment. An alternative is proposed in the form of a politicized ecological ethic of care which can express ecofeminist insights. The paper concludes with consideration of an ecofeminist moral issue: how we choose to understand ourselves morally in relation to what we are willing to count as food. “Contextual moral vegetarianism” represents a response to a politicized ecological ethic of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deane Curtin (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: