Key result
On-pump coronary artery bypass surgery was associated with a greater increase in prothrombotic biomarkers at 24 hours and more bleeding compared with off-pump surgery (P<=0.01).
Why the study?
Does on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery increase biomarkers of hemostasis and inflammation or clinical sequelae compared to off-pump surgery in patients undergoing CABG?
RCT (n=92)
Does on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery increase biomarkers of hemostasis and inflammation or clinical sequelae compared to off-pump surgery in patients undergoing CABG?
p-value: p=<0.01
On-pump CABG is associated with a greater early prothrombotic state and more bleeding compared to off-pump CABG, but without a significant increase in clinical thrombotic events at 1 year.
Favors off-pump CABG to reduce perioperative bleeding in suitable patients; extends RCT evidence on hemostatic differences without 1-year thrombotic impact.
OBJECTIVE: To delineate the effects of extracorporeal bypass on biomarkers of hemostasis, fibrinolysis, and inflammation and clinical sequelae. METHODS: Patients were assigned prospectively and randomly to either on-pump (n=41) or off-pump (n=51) coronary bypass surgery. The concentrations of C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 in blood were quantified before and after (1 and 24 h) surgery. Similar surgical and anesthetic procedures were used for both groups. Clinical events were assessed during initial hospitalization and at the end of 1 year. RESULTS: The concentrations of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 and D-dimer were greater compared with preoperative values 1 and 24 h after surgery in both groups, but their concentrations increased to a greater extent 24 h after surgery in the on-pump group (P<0.01). The concentration of C-reactive protein did not change appreciably immediately after surgery in either group but increased in a parallel manner 24 h after either on-pump or off-pump surgery (P<0.01). Bypass surgery in the on-pump group was associated with greater blood loss during surgery and more bleeding after surgery (P< or =0.01). The incidence of all other complications was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: On-pump surgery was associated with biochemical evidence of a prothrombotic state early after surgery but no greater incidence of thrombotic events was observed. The prothrombotic state might be a consequence of extracorporeal bypass, compensation in response to more bleeding, or both in patients undergoing on-pump surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paulitsch et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease requiring bypass surgery (n=92). On-pump coronary artery bypass surgery vs. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery was evaluated on Biomarkers of hemostasis, fibrinolysis, and inflammation and clinical sequelae (p=<0.01). On-pump coronary artery bypass surgery was associated with a greater increase in prothrombotic biomarkers at 24 hours and more bleeding compared with off-pump surgery (P<=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: