Why the study?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improve cardiovascular performance and reduce myocardial damage compared to on-pump surgery in the first 24 hours?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improve cardiovascular performance and reduce myocardial damage compared to on-pump surgery in the first 24 hours?
Off-pump CABG provides better immediate postoperative cardiovascular performance and less myocardial damage than on-pump CABG, but these benefits are transient and resolve within 24 hours.
Transient off-pump CABG benefits in cardiac index and injury markers resolve by 24 hours; confirms lack of sustained early superiority versus on-pump in this RCT.
We hypothesized that cardiovascular performance during the first 24 postoperative hours would be better in patients after off pump coronary artery bypass grafting compared to conventional on pump surgery. Fifty-nine patients were randomized to on or off pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Hemodynamic parameters, including cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance index were measured before and at 1, 4, and 20 h after surgery. Troponin T and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) were measured before and at 1, 6, and 20 h after surgery. There was no difference in age, sex, ejection fraction or number of grafts between groups. Cardiac index was higher (p=0.05) and systemic vascular resistance index was lower (p=0.007) in the off pump group 1 h after arrival in the intensive care unit. CK-MB and troponin T were significantly lower in the off pump group after 1 h (CK-MB p<0.001, troponin T p<0.001) and after 6 h (CK-MB p=0.02, troponin T p<0.001). After 24 h there was no difference between the two groups. In conclusion, immediately after surgery there was better cardiovascular performance and less release of markers of myocardial damage after off pump coronary surgery. After 24 h all differences were eliminated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenny Vedin (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: