Key result
His bundle pacing is reviewed as a physiological alternative to right ventricular apical pacing to prevent electromechanical dyssynchrony and pacing-induced heart failure.
Why the study?
Does His bundle pacing improve physiological electromechanical coupling and clinical outcomes compared to right ventricular pacing in patients requiring pacemakers?
Does His bundle pacing improve physiological electromechanical coupling and clinical outcomes compared to right ventricular pacing in patients requiring pacemakers?
This review highlights His bundle pacing as a physiological alternative to right ventricular pacing to prevent pacing-induced heart failure.
May warrant consideration to avoid pacing-induced heart failure; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
From 1993 to 2009, nearly 2.9 million pacemakers were implanted in the United States; the majority of which were dual-chamber pacemakers. One of the major physiologic advantages of dual-chamber pacing over single-chamber ventricular pacing is atrioventricular synchrony, which prevents the pacemaker syndrome. However, patients who are pacemaker dependent or use right ventricle (RV) apical pacing more than 40% of the time are at a risk of developing heart failure from electromechanical dyssynchrony. Studies have also shown that RV pacing results in nonphysiological activation of the left ventricle, leading to adverse clinical outcomes. Hence, alternative pacing sites, including the RV outflow tract, the high-RV septal region, bi-ventricular pacing, or His bundle pacing, have been explored for a better physiological electromechanical coupling of the ventricles. Although His bundle pacing has gained attention due to favorable data and clinical outcomes, it has not gained widespread acceptance into clinical practice. Hence, we aim to review the current experience with His bundle pacing and its clinical implications in this article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2018) conducted a review in Pacemaker dependence and pacing-induced dyssynchrony. His bundle pacing vs. Right ventricle (RV) apical pacing was evaluated. His bundle pacing is reviewed as a physiological alternative to right ventricular apical pacing to prevent electromechanical dyssynchrony and pacing-induced heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: