Key result
4Dflow-VP-Net strongly correlates with Doppler echo for transvalvular pressure gradients despite ~11 mmHg Doppler overestimation.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to estimate relative transvalvular pressure gradient noninvasively from 4D flow MRI.
Can a deep convolutional neural network (4Dflow-VP-Net) accurately estimate relative transvalvular pressure gradients from 4D flow MRI in patients with aortic stenosis?
Can a deep convolutional neural network (4Dflow-VP-Net) accurately estimate relative transvalvular pressure gradients from 4D flow MRI in patients with aortic stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel deep learning network can accurately estimate relative transvalvular pressure gradients from 4D flow MRI in patients with aortic stenosis, offering a noninvasive alternative to catheterization.
Purpose To estimate relative transvalvular pressure gradient (TVPG) noninvasively from 4D flow MRI. Methods A novel deep learning–based approach is proposed to estimate pressure gradient across stenosis from four‐dimensional flow MRI (4D flow MRI) velocities. A deep neural network 4D flow Velocity‐to‐Presure Network (4Dflow‐VP‐Net) was trained to learn the spatiotemporal relationship between velocities and pressure in stenotic vessels. Training data were simulated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for different pulsatile flow conditions under an aortic flow waveform. The network was tested to predict pressure from CFD‐simulated velocity data, in vitro 4D flow MRI data, and in vivo 4D flow MRI data of patients with both moderate and severe aortic stenosis. TVPG derived from 4Dflow‐VP‐Net was compared to catheter‐based pressure measurements for available flow rates, in vitro and Doppler echocardiography–based pressure measurement, in vivo. Results Relative pressures calculated by 4Dflow‐VP‐Net and in vitro pressure catheterization revealed strong correlation ( r 2 = 0.91). Correlations analysis of TVPG from reference CFD and 4Dflow‐VP‐Net for 450 simulated flow conditions showed strong correlation ( r 2 = 0.99). TVPG from in vitro MRI had a correlation coefficient of r 2 = 0.98 with reference CFD. 4Dflow‐VP‐Net, applied to 4D flow MRI in 16 patients, showed comparable TVPG measurement with Doppler echocardiography ( r 2 = 0.85). Bland–Altman analysis of TVPG measurements showed mean bias and limits of agreement of −0.20 ± 2.07 mmHg and 0.19 ± 0.45 mmHg for CFD‐simulated velocities and in vitro 4D flow velocities. In patients, overestimation of Doppler echocardiography relative to TVPG from 4Dflow‐VP‐Net (10.99 ± 6.77 mmHg) was observed. Conclusion The proposed approach can predict relative pressure in both in vitro and in vivo 4D flow MRI of aortic stenotic patients with high fidelity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nath et al. (2023) studied moderate and severe aortic stenosis (n=16). 4Dflow-VP-Net vs. Doppler echocardiography, catheterization, and CFD was evaluated on Relative transvalvular pressure gradient (TVPG) (r2 = 0.85). 4Dflow-VP-Net estimation of transvalvular pressure gradients from 4D flow MRI correlated strongly with Doppler echocardiography in patients, though Doppler overestimated by 11.0±6.8 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: