Key result
Global HF roundtable highlights region-specific registries and multidisciplinary teams to optimize therapies.
Why the study?
Heart failure prevalence is increasing globally with aging populations, prompting the need to explore global innovations and exchange ideas and best practices internationally.
Highlights the need for global collaboration, better registry data, and multidisciplinary approaches to address the growing worldwide burden of heart failure.
Should not yet alter HF protocols; leaves open whether registries and teams improve global outcomes.
The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing in many regions of the world, particularly within the context of aging populations in many countries. The Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) sought to explore areas of global HF innovation with the goal of exchanging ideas and best practices internationally. The HFSA Annual Scientific Meeting included roundtable discussions focused on the challenges faced by each of the participating regions and sharing innovative solutions. Themes identified include the lack of high-quality region-specific HF registry data that is required to accurately define patient needs and to facilitate outcome metrics; the tension between providing care that is accessible to the patient vs. concentrating highly-specialized care within tertiary centers; the need to accredit and coordinate HF care across a spectrum of healthcare delivery centers within regions; opportunities to improve the prevention and timely diagnosis of HF to enhance population outcomes, especially in communities facing healthcare disparities; and the evolution of multidisciplinary team-based care, particularly in optimizing access to guideline-directed medical therapies. This article summarizes the major themes that emerged during the roundtable sessions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manla et al. (2025) conducted a review in Heart failure. Roundtable discussions identified key themes in global heart failure care, including the need for region-specific registry data, coordinated care, and multidisciplinary teams to optimize therapies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: