Key result
Higher radial augmentation index linked to ~29% greater hypertension risk in women, but not men.
Why the study?
Although arterial stiffness is linked to incident hypertension, whether the augmentation index affects the new onset of hypertension remains without consensus.
Cohort (n=1,615)
Effect estimate: OR 1.09 (95% CI 0.95-1.27)
p-value: p=0.226
Sex modifies the association between radial augmentation index and incident hypertension, suggesting rAI screening may be useful for primary prevention in high-risk women.
BACKGROUND: Arterial stiffness, as assessed by aortic ultrasound and pulse wave velocity, is associated with incident hypertension. However, there is still no consensus on whether the augmentation index (AI) affects new onset of hypertension. This study investigated the relationship of radial AI (rAI) and incident hypertension in a Chinese community-based population without hypertension at baseline. METHOD: A total of 1,615 Chinese non-hypertensive participants from an atherosclerosis cohort in Beijing, China were included in our analysis. Baseline rAI normalized to heart rate of 75 beats/min (rAIp75) was obtained using HEM-9000AI. New-onset hypertension was defined as blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg or self-reported hypertension or taking anti-hypertensive medications at the follow up survey. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the impact of rAIp75 on the risk of new-onset hypertension. RESULTS: for interaction = 0.0133). CONCLUSIONS: Sex modified the effect of the rAI on incident hypertension in a Chinese, community-based, non-hypertensive population. Screening of the rAI could be considered in women with a high risk of hypertension for the purpose of primary intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiao et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Incident hypertension (n=1,615). Radial augmentation index (rAIp75) was evaluated on Incident hypertension (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.95-1.27, p=0.226). Every 10% increase in radial augmentation index was significantly associated with a 29% increased risk of incident hypertension in women (OR 1.29), but not in men or the overall population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: