Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2005Hypertension ResearchOpen Access

Blood Pressure Reduction and Cardiovascular Prevention: An Update Including the 2003-2004 Secondary Prevention Trials

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

New antihypertensive drugs provided similar protection against total mortality compared to conventional therapy, with cardiovascular outcomes largely explained by the degree of systolic blood pressure reduction.

Why the study?

Do new antihypertensive drugs improve cardiovascular outcomes compared to old drugs or placebo beyond their blood pressure-lowering effects in hypertensive or high-risk patients?

Population

Hypertensive or high-risk patients from clinical trials published before 2005

Comparison

New antihypertensive drugs vs Old antihypertensive drugs or placebo

Design

Meta-analysis

Authors

Jan A. Staessen
Jan A. StaessenGeneral / Preventive / Lipids
YLYan LiGeneral CardiologyLTLutgarde ThijsUniversity College Dublin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Focus on systolic BP targets over drug class; confirms 2003 meta-analysis equivalence for mortality.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=149,407)

Structured PICO

Do new antihypertensive drugs improve cardiovascular outcomes compared to old drugs or placebo beyond their blood pressure-lowering effects in hypertensive or high-risk patients?

P
Population
Hypertensive or high-risk patients from clinical trials published before 2005 (meta-analysis including 30 trials with 149,407 randomized patients in meta-regression, and 15 trials with 120,574 patients comparing new vs old drugs)
I
Intervention
New antihypertensive drugs (calcium-channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers)
C
Comparator
Old antihypertensive drugs (diuretics, beta-blockers) or placebo
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular outcomes (composite of all cardiovascular events, fatal and non-fatal stroke, fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, and heart failure)hard clinical

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.94-1.02)

p-value: p=0.38

The cardiovascular benefits of newer antihypertensive agents are predominantly driven by the magnitude of systolic blood pressure reduction rather than drug-specific pleiotropic properties.

Limitations

  • Use of composite endpoints with varying definitions across trials
  • Wide range of secondary endpoints made obtaining pooled estimates difficult

Cite This Study

Staessen et al. (2005) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension and high cardiovascular risk (n=149,407). New antihypertensive drugs (calcium-channel blockers, ACE inhibitors, AR1 blockers) vs. Conventional therapy (diuretics, beta-blockers) or placebo was evaluated on Total mortality (new vs. old antihypertensive drugs) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.02, p=0.38). New antihypertensive drugs provided similar protection against total mortality compared to conventional therapy, with cardiovascular outcomes largely explained by the degree of systolic blood pressure reduction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a127212ea48cb855a34da76https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.28.385

Topics

Hypertension management
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effect of Antihypertensive Agents on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Disease and Normal Blood Pressure2004 · 1,155 citations
  2. 2Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of a Calcium Antagonist and a Diuretic in Elderly Hypertensives1999 · 140 citations
  3. 3Effect of Amlodipine on the Progression of Atherosclerosis and the Occurrence of Clinical Events2000 · 671 citations
  4. 4Effect of Ramipril vs Amlodipine on Renal Outcomes in Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis<SUBTITLE>A Randomized Controlled Trial</SUBTITLE>2001 · 945 citations
  5. 5Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 391998 · 1,396 citations