Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial compares e-mail and mail responses in curriculum evaluations among medical students, suggesting caution in e-mail use.
BACKGROUND: The proliferation of electronic information delivery systems has led to increasing use of e-mail as a rapid method of gathering information. Little research has been conducted on the use of e-mail for collecting curriculum evaluations. PURPOSE: To compare e-mailed and mailed educational evaluations for 4th-year medical students. METHODS: Curriculum evaluations were sent to 4th-year medical students who were randomly assigned to receive the survey either by mail or e-mail. RESULTS: Mailed evaluations yielded a higher return rate, fewer number of students omitting items, and shorter responses to an open-ended question than evaluations completed via e-mail. CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings have limited generalizability because of low response rates and small sample sizes, the results suggest caution when using e-mail to collect curriculum evaluations from 4th-year medical students.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paolo et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: