An experimental polypropylene (PP) nanocomposite, containing approximately 4 wt % of an organophilic montmorillonite clay, was prepared and characterized, and its properties were compared with those of talc‐filled (20–40 wt %) compositions. Weight reduction, with maintained or even improved flexural and tensile moduli, especially at temperatures up to 70°C, was a major driving force behind this work. By a comparison with the analytical data from a nylon 6 (PA‐6) nanocomposite, it was found that the PP nanocomposite contained well‐dispersed, intercalated clay particles; however, X‐ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis, and permeability measurements confirmed that exfoliation of the clay in PP was largely absent. The increased glass‐transition temperature ( T g ) of a PA‐6 nanocomposite, which possessed fully exfoliated particles, indicated the molecular character of the matrix–particle interaction, whereas the PP nanocomposite exhibited simple matrix–filler interactions with no increase in T g . The PP nanocomposite exhibited a weight reduction of approximately 12% in comparison with the 20% talc‐filled PP, while maintaining comparable stiffness. Undoubtedly, considerable advantages may be available if a fully exfoliated PP nanocomposite is fabricated; however, with the materials available, a combination of talc, or alternative reinforcements, and nanocomposite filler particles may provide optimum performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellis et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: