Key result
Optimal skin electrode placement directly opposite the catheter tip created deeper (5.8 vs 4.6 mm) and wider (9.3 vs 7.7 mm) lesions compared to standard placement (P<=0.001).
Why the study?
Does optimal skin electrode placement directly opposite the catheter tip improve radiofrequency ablation lesion dimensions and efficiency compared to standard placement in an in vivo sheep and finite element model?
Does optimal skin electrode placement directly opposite the catheter tip improve radiofrequency ablation lesion dimensions and efficiency compared to standard placement in an in vivo sheep and finite element model?
Positioning the skin electrode directly opposite the ablation catheter tip creates deeper, larger, and more consistent lesions while reducing blood heating compared to standard placement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change ablation practice; leaves open whether optimal placement improves human lesion dimensions or outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of skin electrode location on radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesion dimensions and energy requirements. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effects of skin electrode location on RF ablation lesion dimensions and efficiency. METHODS AND RESULTS: Temperature-controlled ablation at 60 degrees C for 60 seconds was performed in six sheep. Paired lesions were created in the lateral, anterior, posterior, and septal walls of both the ventricles. For group 1 lesions, the skin electrode was positioned directly opposite the catheter tip (optimal). For group 2 lesions, we used either the standard posterior location or an anterior location if the posterior skin electrode location was used for group 1. Group 1 lesions were 5.8+/-0.8 mm deep and 9.3+/-1.9 mm wide, compared with 4.6+/-1.0 mm deep and 7.7+/-1.9 mm wide group 2 lesions (P < or = 0.001). Group 1 lesion dimensions also had less variability. A finite element model was used to simulate temperature-controlled ablation and to study the effect of skin electrode locations on lesion dimensions, ablation efficiency, and blood heating. The optimal location was 1.6 times more efficient, and the volume of blood heated to > or = 90 degrees C was 0.005 mm3 for optimal versus 2.2 mm3 for the nonoptimal location. CONCLUSION: Optimal skin electrode placement: (1) creates deeper and larger lesions; (2) reduces lesion size variability; and (3) decreases blood heating.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jain et al. (1998) studied Radiofrequency ablation (n=6). Optimal skin electrode location (directly opposite catheter tip) vs. Standard posterior or anterior skin electrode location was evaluated on Lesion depth (mm) (p=<=0.001). Optimal skin electrode placement directly opposite the catheter tip created deeper (5.8 vs 4.6 mm) and wider (9.3 vs 7.7 mm) lesions compared to standard placement (P<=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: