Key result
Participants with only one ideal cardiovascular health metric had a 4.40-fold increased susceptibility of stroke compared to those with all seven ideal health metrics.
Why the study?
Does a higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics reduce the prevalence of stroke in rural Chinese adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=11,417)
Does a higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics reduce the prevalence of stroke in rural Chinese adults?
Effect estimate: 4.40-fold increase
Adherence to a higher number of ideal cardiovascular health metrics is strongly associated with a lower prevalence of stroke in rural Chinese populations.
Supports promoting multiple ideal CVH metrics for stroke prevention in rural Chinese adults; extends prior associations but leaves causality open.
BACKGROUND: In 2010, the American Heart Association developed a new definition of ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) based on seven cardiovascular health metrics. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between modified ideal CVH metrics and the risk of stroke in the rural population of Northeast China. METHODS: We included 11,417 adults from the rural population in Northeast China and collected all the information, including the baseline characteristics, history of stroke, and the seven ideal CVH metrics. RESULTS: Our results showed that the presence of stroke was associated with high body mass index (BMI), poor diet score (salt intake), high total cholesterol (TC), high blood pressure (BP), and high fasting plasma glucose (FPG). The prevalence of stroke increased as the number of ideal CVH metrics decreased, and peaked to 13.1% among those with only one ideal CVH metric. Participants with only one ideal CVH had a 4.40-fold increased susceptibility of stroke than those with all seven ideal health metrics. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that people with a better CVH status had a lower prevalence of stroke and the susceptibility of stroke increased with the decreasing of the number of ideal CVH metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Stroke (n=11,417). Modified ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics vs. All seven ideal health metrics was evaluated on Prevalence of stroke (4.40-fold increase). Participants with only one ideal cardiovascular health metric had a 4.40-fold increased susceptibility of stroke compared to those with all seven ideal health metrics.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: