Why the study?
Despite guideline-recommended DOACs, AF patients retain a residual risk of thromboembolic events driven by incompletely understood mechanisms, prompting investigation into platelet function.
Do individuals with DOAC-treated permanent atrial fibrillation exhibit altered platelet phenotype and reactivity compared to matched controls without AF?
Do individuals with DOAC-treated permanent atrial fibrillation exhibit altered platelet phenotype and reactivity compared to matched controls without AF?
Individuals with DOAC-treated permanent AF exhibit altered platelet reactivity and low-grade inflammation, suggesting a potential mechanism for their residual thromboembolic risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Altered platelet reactivity in DOAC-treated permanent AF was associated with inflammation markers; hypothesis-generating for residual thromboembolic risk mechanisms.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is linked to an elevated risk of thromboembolic events. Despite the use of guideline-recommended direct anticoagulants (DOACs), a significant proportion of AF patients show a residual risk of thromboembolic events, driven by mechanisms that are not fully understood. We conducted a pilot study to characterize the platelet function in DOACs-treated AF patients, to explore whether an association between platelets and the residual thromboembolic risk exists. Within the Age-It project of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, we examined by flow cytometry the platelet phenotype, reactivity, and mitochondrial function and quantified 12 inflammatory cytokines of individuals with DOACs-treated permanent AF without a history of stroke (n = 18, 66 ± 13 years, 39% females), compared with an age-, sex-, and comorbidity-matched control group without AF (n = 18, 65 ± 11 years, 39% females). Unstimulated circulating platelets of DOACs-treated AF displayed a low-adhesive phenotype compared with matched controls. Upon stimulation, platelets of DOACs-treated AF were hyporeactive to ADP and PAR1 stimulation, but hyper-reactive to GPVI stimulation (adjusted p < 0.01). The lower responsiveness to ADP correlated with increased plasmatic concentrations of IFN-γ (r = − 0.539; p < 0.05) and TNF-α (r = − 0.472; p < 0.05). The higher reactivity to GPVI associated with an increased mitochondrial function, which positively correlated with TNF-α levels. Individuals with AF treated with DOACs exhibit low-grade inflammation and an altered platelet reactivity, suggesting a potential mechanism behind their residual thromboembolic risk. Further well-powered studies are warranted to test whether the observed platelet phenotype is implicated with the residual thromboembolic events in DOACs-treated AF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miglionico et al. (2025) studied Permanent Atrial Fibrillation. Direct Oral Anticoagulants was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: