Key result
Second-generation DES linked to ~47% lower 5-year stent thrombosis risk versus first-generation stents.
Why the study?
Data were limited on long-term stent-related adverse events related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in second-generation versus first-generation drug-eluting stents.
Do second-generation drug-eluting stents reduce definite stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularization compared to first-generation drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing first coronary revascularization?
Cohort (n=15,009)
Yes
Do second-generation drug-eluting stents reduce definite stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularization compared to first-generation drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing first coronary revascularization?
Second-generation drug-eluting stents are associated with significantly lower 5-year risks of definite stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularization compared to first-generation stents, and dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year does not significantly reduce very late stent thrombosis in second-generation stents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support second-generation stent selection in practice; extends observational data but leaves causality and practice change open.
There are limited data on the long-term stent-related adverse events as related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in second-generation (G2) drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with first-generation (G1) DES. This study sought to compare the long-term stent-related outcomes of G2-DES with those of G1-DES. The study group consisted of 15,009 patients who underwent their first coronary revascularization with DES from the CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG (Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting) Registry Cohort-2 (first-generation drug-eluting stent [G1-DES] period; n = 5,382) and Cohort-3 (second-generation drug eluting stent [G2-DES] period; n = 9,627). The primary outcome measures were definite stent thrombosis (ST) and target vessel revascularization (TVR). The cumulative 5-year incidences of definite ST and TVR were significantly lower in the G2-DES group than in the G1-DES group (0.7% vs 1.4%; P < 0.001; and 16.2% vs 22.1%; P < 0.001, respectively). The lower adjusted risk of G2-DES relative to G1-DES for definite ST and TVR remained significant (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37-0.76; P < 0.001; and HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.68-0.81; P < 0.001, respectively). In the landmark analysis that was based on the DAPT status at 1 year, the lower adjusted risk of on-DAPT status relative to off-DAPT was significant for definite ST beyond 1 year in the G1-DES stratum (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.76; P = 0.004) but not in the G2-DES stratum (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.26-1.68; P = 0.38) (Pinteraction = 0.14). G2-DES compared with G1-DES were associated with a significantly lower risk for stent-related adverse events, including definite ST and TVR. DAPT beyond 1 year was associated with a significantly lower risk for very late ST of G1-DES but not for that of G2-DES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshikawa et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=15,009). Second-generation drug-eluting stents (G2-DES) vs. First-generation drug-eluting stents (G1-DES) was evaluated on Definite stent thrombosis (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76, p=<0.001). Second-generation drug-eluting stents significantly reduced the 5-year risk of definite stent thrombosis (HR 0.53) and target vessel revascularization (HR 0.74) compared with first-generation stents.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: