Key result
In patients taking oral anticoagulants, 44% of hemorrhages occurred when INRs were above the therapeutic range, and 48% of thromboemboli occurred when INRs were below the therapeutic range.
Why the study?
Does improved anticoagulation control prevent hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events in patients taking oral anticoagulants?
Population
45 studies pooling 71,065 patients taking oral anticoagulants with a target INR range.
Design
Meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
Intensified INR monitoring may avert many events; confirms time in therapeutic range as a pivotal, modifiable quality metric.
Meta-Analysis (n=71,065)
Does improved anticoagulation control prevent hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events in patients taking oral anticoagulants?
Almost half of all anticoagulant-associated adverse events (hemorrhages and thromboemboli) occur when INRs are outside the therapeutic range, highlighting the critical need for improved anticoagulation control.
Oake et al. (2007) conducted a meta-analysis in Patients taking oral anticoagulants (n=71,065). Oral anticoagulants was evaluated on Proportion of hemorrhages occurring above therapeutic INR range (95% CI 39%-49%). In patients taking oral anticoagulants, 44% of hemorrhages occurred when INRs were above the therapeutic range, and 48% of thromboemboli occurred when INRs were below the therapeutic range.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: