Key result
The presence of multiple arrhythmogenic foci (>2) was an independent contributing factor for persistent atrial fibrillation compared to paroxysmal AF (88% vs 65%; OR 4.69; 95% CI 1.82-12.09; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Are multiple arrhythmogenic foci associated with the development of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Observational (n=214)
Are multiple arrhythmogenic foci associated with the development of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing catheter ablation?
Multiple arrhythmogenic foci are independently associated with the development of persistent AF, though their role may diminish if AF persists for >12 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multiple foci may stratify progression risk pre-ablation; leaves open whether targeting them alters outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The presence of multiple arrhythmogenic sources may be associated with the perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that multiple foci might be involved in the development of AF persistency. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen consecutive patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. The location of the arrhythmogenic foci was determined using simultaneous recordings from multipolar catheters before and after pulmonary vein isolation during an isoproterenol administration. We detected 500 arrhythmogenic foci (263 foci as AF initiators, and 237 foci as non-AF initiators). High-dose isoproterenol infusions (ranging from 2 to 20 microg/min) revealed potential arrhythmogenic foci, especially non-pulmonary vein foci (55%). Persistent AF was more highly associated with an incidence of multiple (>2) foci than paroxysmal AF (88% versus 65%, P=0.002), and a multivariate analysis demonstrated that multiple foci (>2) were an independent contributing factor for persistent AF (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval, 4.69; 1.82 to 12.09, P<0.001). In paroxysmal AF, the number of foci was higher in patients with long-term AF (>24 hours) than in those with short-lasting AF (2.64+/-0.14 versus 1.77+/-0.16, P=0.001). In the persistent AF group, the patients with short-lasting AF (<12 months) had a greater number of foci than did those with long-term AF (>12 months) (3.62+/-0.15 versus 1.92+/-0.16, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple foci were likely to be involved in the development of persistent AF. However, if AF persisted for >12 months, they may not have had a significant effect on the AF perpetuation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kurotobi et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=214). Isoproterenol administration during catheter ablation was evaluated on Persistent AF (association with multiple foci >2) (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.82 to 12.09, p=<0.001). The presence of multiple arrhythmogenic foci (>2) was an independent contributing factor for persistent atrial fibrillation compared to paroxysmal AF (88% vs 65%; OR 4.69; 95% CI 1.82-12.09; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: