This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
When thinking about Euro-Russian relations, IR scholars focus on why conflict has replaced cooperation. The "geostrategic debate" excludes the possible coexistence of cooperation and conflict. In this Introduction to the special issue, we track the evolution of conflict and cooperation patterns in three zones of contact (Estonia, Kaliningrad, Moldova) between 1991 and 2016. Our findings show that, although the standard narrative remains compelling, in several cases patterns of cooperation/conflict are largely autonomous from the geostrategic level. This diversity justifies the elaboration of theoretical propositions distinguishing fluid, rigid, and disputed symbolic boundaries which are constructed in and through geopolitical fields.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mérand et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: