Key result
Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi adults linked to ~250% higher cardiovascular multimorbidity vs White British adults.
Why the study?
Socioeconomic factors and health behaviours may drive ethnic health inequalities in multimorbidity across distinct ethnic groups.
Does ethnicity affect the risk of general and cardiovascular multimorbidity independent of social-economic factors in adults in England?
Cross-Sectional (n=54,438)
Does ethnicity affect the risk of general and cardiovascular multimorbidity independent of social-economic factors in adults in England?
Ethnic minority groups, particularly South Asian and Afro-Caribbean populations, have a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular multimorbidity independent of socioeconomic factors.
Ethnic disparities in cardiovascular multimorbidity warrant consideration in UK assessments; leaves open causal pathways and intervention effects.
BACKGROUND: Social-economic factors and health behaviours may be driving variation in ethnic health inequalities in multimorbidity including among distinct ethnic groups. METHODS: Using the cross-sectional nationally representative Health Surveys for England 2011-18 (N = 54 438, aged 16+), we performed multivariable logistic regression on the odds of having general multimorbidity (≥2 longstanding conditions) by ethnicity [British White (reference group), White Irish, Other White, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Chinese, African, Caribbean, White mixed, Other Mixed], adjusting for age, sex, education, area deprivation, obesity, smoking status and survey year. This was repeated for cardiovascular multimorbidity (N = 37 148, aged 40+: having ≥2 of the following: self-reported diabetes, hypertension, heart attack or stroke) and multiple cardiometabolic risk biomarkers (HbA1c ≥6.5%, raised blood pressure, total cholesterol ≥5mmol/L). RESULTS: Twenty percent of adults had general multimorbidity. In fully adjusted models, compared with the White British majority, Other White [odds ratio (OR) = 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.74], Chinese (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93) and African adults (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.42-0.69), had lower odds of general multimorbidity. Among adults aged 40+, Pakistani (OR = 1.27, 95% CI 0.97-1.66; P = 0.080) and Bangladeshi (OR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.16-2.65) had increased odds, and African adults had decreased odds (OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.47-0.83) of general multimorbidity. Risk of cardiovascular multimorbidity was higher among Indian (OR = 3.31, 95% CI 2.56-4.28), Pakistani (OR = 3.48, 95% CI 2.52-4.80), Bangladeshi (OR = 3.67, 95% CI 1.98-6.78), African (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.47), Caribbean (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.59-2.99) and White mixed (OR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.14-3.44) adults. Indian adults were also at risk of having multiple cardiometabolic risk biomarkers. CONCLUSION: Ethnic inequalities in multimorbidity are independent of social-economic factors. Ethnic minority groups are particularly at risk of cardiovascular multimorbidity, which may be exacerbated by poorer management of cardiometabolic risk requiring further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fat et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Multimorbidity (n=54,438). Non-White ethnicity vs. White British ethnicity was evaluated on General multimorbidity (≥2 longstanding conditions). Compared with White British adults, Indian (OR 3.31), Pakistani (OR 3.48), and Bangladeshi (OR 3.67) adults had significantly higher odds of cardiovascular multimorbidity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: