This expert consensus statement provides 32 evidence-based recommendations for optimal ICD programming and testing to maximize clinical benefit and minimize risks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adoption of standardized ICD programming in clinical practice; extends prior expert guidance for device management.
No abstract was published with this document — society guidelines, consensus pathways, and scientific statements are typically released without one. See the Key Points and the linked PDF for the full content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilkoff et al. (2016) conducted a review in Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) programming and testing. Optimal ICD programming and testing recommendations was evaluated on Consensus on recommendations. An expert consensus statement from four international electrophysiology societies provides 32 recommendations on optimal ICD programming and testing, achieving an average of 96% consensus.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: