Key result
Leadless pacemakers cause a ~48 ml cardiac MR artifact affecting LV myocardium more in diastole.
Why the study?
Cardiac MR after leadless pacemaker implantation causes image distortion that can affect myocardial tissue evaluation, but its extent across individual ventricular segments compared to conventional devices remains unclear.
What is the extent and impact of image artifacts caused by leadless pacemakers during cardiac MR imaging?
Observational (n=20)
What is the extent and impact of image artifacts caused by leadless pacemakers during cardiac MR imaging?
Leadless pacemakers cause localized CMR artifacts primarily in the septal and apical segments, which can be minimized by evaluating images in diastole.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caution advised assessing LV myocardium on CMR with leadless pacemakers; leaves open optimal diastolic timing to minimize artifacts.
INTRODUCTION: When cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) is performed after previous leadless transcatheter pacemaker implantation, an image distortion has to be expected in the heart region and evaluation of myocardial tissue can be affected. In this clinical prospective study, we aim to assess the extent and impact of this artifact on individual ventricular segments and compare it to conventional pacing devices. METHODS: Total of 20 patients with leadless pacemaker placed in the right ventricle underwent cardiac MR imaging in a 1.5 Tesla scanner. A multiplanar segmentation was used to demarcate the left and right ventricular myocardium as well as the pacemaker-caused image artifact in systolic and diastolic time frames. Artifact size and its relative influence on myocardial segments were quantitatively assessed and expressed in AHA-17 model. RESULTS: Implanted leadless pacemaker caused an image artifact with a volume of 48 ± 5 ml. Most distorted were the apical septal (53 ± 23%), apical inferior (30 ± 18%), and midventricular inferoseptal (30 ± 20%) segments. The artifact intersection with basal and lateral segments was none or negligible (up to 2%). The portion of left ventricular (LV) myocardium affected by the artifact was significantly higher in systole (8 ± 4%) compared to diastole (10 ± 3%; p < .001). CONCLUSION: Implantation of leadless pacemaker represents no obstacle for cardiac MR imaging but causes an image artifact located mostly in septal, inferoseptal, and anteroseptal segments of apical and midventricular LV myocardium. With the exception of the apex, diastolic timing reduces the image distortion of all segments and improves global ventricular assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hála et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Patients with leadless Micra pacemakers (n=20). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs. Conventional pacing devices was evaluated on Artifact size and its relative influence on myocardial segments (p=<.001). Leadless pacemakers caused a cardiac MR image artifact of 48 ± 5 ml, affecting the LV myocardium differently in systole (8 ± 4%) compared to diastole (10 ± 3%; p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: