Does adjustment of therapy according to serial measurements of NT-proBNP improve outcomes in comparison with adjusting therapy according to unassisted clinical acumen in patients with heart failure?
NT-proBNP and BNP are powerful prognostic indicators in heart failure, and their serial measurement has the potential to guide and optimize therapy better than clinical assessment alone.
Abstract With increasing cardiac dysfunction, a complex neurohormonal response results in increasing circulating levels of an array of plasma hormones. Increments in plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and their amino-terminal congeners are more closely related to cardiac structure and function and to cardiovascular prognosis than changes in other plasma neurohormones. Reports suggest that changes in plasma BNP levels in the course of treatment of acutely decompensated heart failure provide a more powerful prognostic indicator of the likelihood of survival or recurrent decompensation than symptomatic assessment. This observation requires a randomised controlled trial in which changes in peptide levels determine aggression and duration of in-patient therapy in order to establish whether this indicator can improve results from management of acute in-patient heart failure. Plasma BNP or NT-proBNP is a powerful independent predictor of mortality and morbidity in long-term follow-up of heart failure cohorts. In addition, it appears likely to be a good predictor of beneficial response to the addition of beta blockade to anti-heart failure pharmacotherapy. Finally, adjustment of therapy for heart failure according to serial measurements of NT-proBNP promises to improve outcomes in comparison with adjusting therapy according to unassisted clinical acumen.
Richards et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: