Key result
Empagliflozin linked to a ~3% greater LVEF increase versus metformin in non-diabetic HFmrEF.
Why the study?
Heart failure remains a significant healthcare challenge, prompting the need to assess the short-term cardiac effects of empagliflozin and metformin in patients with HF and mildly reduced ejection fraction without diabetes.
Does empagliflozin improve cardiac function parameters compared to metformin in non-diabetic patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction heart failure?
Case-Control (n=60)
Does empagliflozin improve cardiac function parameters compared to metformin in non-diabetic patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 9.2% vs 6.1%
Empagliflozin provides greater short-term improvements in ejection fraction and left ventricular end-systolic dimension compared to metformin when added to standard quadruple therapy in non-diabetic patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction heart failure.
Empagliflozin may improve EF more than metformin in non-diabetic HFmrEF; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
Heart failure (HF) remains a significant problem for healthcare systems, requiring the use of intervention and multimodal management strategies. We aimed to assess the short-term effect of empagliflozin (EMPA) and metformin on cardiac function parameters, including ventricular dimension-hypertrophy, septal thickness, ejection fraction (EF), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in patients with HF and mildly reduced EF. A case-control study included 60 newly diagnosed patients with HF. Patients were divided into two groups: Group E received standard HF treatment (carvedilol, bumetanide, sacubitril-valsartan, spironolactone) plus EMPA 10 mg daily, and Group M received standard HF treatment plus metformin 500 mg daily. After three months of treatment, Group E had a significantly higher EF than Group M compared to initial measurements (a change of 9.2% versus 6.1%, respectively). We found similar results in the left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD), with mean reductions of 0.72 mm for Group E and 0.23 mm for Group M. Regarding cardiac indicators, the level of NT-proBNP was considerably decreased in both groups. However, the reduction was significantly greater in group E than in group M compared to the initial level (mean reduction: 719.9 vs. 973.6, respectively). When combined with quadruple anti-heart failure therapy, metformin enhanced several echocardiographic parameters, showing effects similar to those of EMPA when used in the same treatment regimen. However, the benefits of EMPA were more pronounced, particularly regarding improvements in EF and LVESD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fawzi et al. (2024) conducted a case-control in Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction without diabetes (n=60). Empagliflozin vs. Metformin 500 mg daily was evaluated on Change in ejection fraction (EF). Empagliflozin added to standard therapy improved ejection fraction more than metformin (9.2% vs 6.1% increase) in patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction heart failure without diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: