Key result
Tissue Doppler imaging-derived myocardial performance index >0.66 was the best independent predictor of cardiovascular death and heart failure admission over a median 32-month follow-up.
Why the study?
Does TDI-MPI predict adverse cardiac events better than conventional echo parameters in patients with diastolic dysfunction or HFPEF?
Population
408 patients who had diastolic dysfunction without heart failure (HF) or HFPEF
Comparison
Evaluation by tissue Doppler imaging-derived… vs Evaluation by mitral flow or conventional echo…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 32 months
Authors
Loading...
Supports TDI-MPI for HFpEF prognostication; leaves open prospective validation over conventional parameters.
Cohort (n=408)
Does TDI-MPI predict adverse cardiac events better than conventional echo parameters in patients with diastolic dysfunction or HFPEF?
TDI-MPI is a useful prognostic parameter for evaluating patients with HFPEF, outperforming conventional mitral flow parameters.
Kim et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) (n=408). Tissue Doppler imaging-derived myocardial performance index (TDI-MPI) vs. Mitral flow (MF) parameters was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death and admission for heart failure. Tissue Doppler imaging-derived myocardial performance index >0.66 was the best independent predictor of cardiovascular death and heart failure admission over a median 32-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: