Key result
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing after proximal thoracic aortic repair was safe (0 serious adverse events), but VO2peak was significantly reduced vs normative values (19.2 vs 29.3 mL/kg/min, P<.0001).
Why the study?
Data were limited regarding cardiopulmonary exercise testing and cardiorespiratory fitness following open repair for a proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection.
Is cardiopulmonary exercise testing safe and what is the cardiorespiratory fitness level in patients following open repair for a proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection?
Observational (n=128)
Is cardiopulmonary exercise testing safe and what is the cardiorespiratory fitness level in patients following open repair for a proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection?
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing appears safe approximately 3 months after open repair for proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection, though these patients exhibit significantly reduced cardiorespiratory fitness.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CPET appears safe with reduced fitness after proximal aortic repair; hypothesis-generating for rehabilitation trials before practice change.
PURPOSE: There are limited data on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), following open repair for a proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection. The aim was to evaluate serious adverse events, abnormal CPX event rate, CRF (peak oxygen uptake, (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2peak), and blood pressure. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified from cardiac rehabilitation participation or prospectively enrolled in a research study and grouped by phenotype: (1) bicuspid aortic valve/thoracic aortic aneurysm, (2) tricuspid aortic valve/thoracic aortic aneurysm, and (3) acute type A aortic dissection. RESULTS: Patients (n = 128) completed a CPX a median of 2.9 mo (interquartile range: 1.8, 3.5) following repair. No serious adverse events were reported, although 3 abnormal exercise tests (2% event rate) were observed. Eighty-one percent of CPX studies were considered peak effort (defined as respiratory exchange ratio of ≥1.05). Median measured (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2peak was <36% predicted normative values (19.2 mL·kgmin vs 29.3 mLkgmin, P < .0001); the most marked impairment in (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2peak was observed in the acute type A aortic dissection group (<40% normative values), which was significantly different from other groups (P < .05). Peak exercise systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 160 mm Hg (144, 172) and 70 mm Hg (62, 80), with no differences noted between groups. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no serious adverse events with an abnormal CPX event rate of only 2% 3 mo following repair for a proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection. (Equation is included in full-text article.)O2peak was reduced among all patient groups, especially the acute type A aortic dissection group, which may be clinically significant, given the well-established prognostic importance of reduced cardiorespiratory fitness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hornsby et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection (n=128). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) vs. Predicted normative values was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) (p=<.0001). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing after proximal thoracic aortic repair was safe (0 serious adverse events), but VO2peak was significantly reduced vs normative values (19.2 vs 29.3 mL/kg/min, P<.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: