Why the study?
Does early intravenous thrombolytic therapy improve left ventricular diastolic function compared to delayed PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=38)
Does early intravenous thrombolytic therapy improve left ventricular diastolic function compared to delayed PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 44.2% vs 63.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
Early thrombolytic therapy may improve left ventricular diastolic function more effectively than delayed PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction when immediate PCI is unavailable.
May support early thrombolysis for LV diastolic recovery when PCI delayed; leaves open randomized confirmation in AMI.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of thrombolytic therapy and delayed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the time constant of left ventricular (LV) isovolumic relaxation. Of 38 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recruited in the study, 26 patients (TL group) received intravenously thrombolytic therapy within 12 hours after the AMI event, and 12 patients (PCI group) received delayed PCI at fifth or sixth day after the AMI event. LV pressure was measured with Millar catheters during diagnostic catheterization both at first week after admission and at 3-month follow-up. We found that in the patients with the thrombolytic therapy, the time constant of the isovolumic relaxation significantly decreases from 50.1 ±± 11.0 ms measured at the first week to 44.2 ±± 8.8 ms measured at the 3-month follow-up (p<;0.05). In contrast, the time constant measured from the patients with PCI is significantly increased from 46.3 ±± 8.4 at the first week to 63.1 ±± 15.9 ms at the 3-month follow-up (p<;0.05). In addition, the time constant was considerably smaller in the TL group patients than in the PCI group patients three months after occurrence of AMI (p<;0.001). In conclusion, myocardial microvessels early reopened by the thrombolysis may dominantly contribute to the improvement in LV diastolic function, suggesting that the thrombolytic therapy may play a more progressive role in the AMI-related treatment as PCI equipment is not immediately available within 12 hours.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=38). Intravenous thrombolytic therapy vs. Delayed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was evaluated on Time constant of left ventricular (LV) isovolumic relaxation at 3 months (p=<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: