Key result
Aerobic exercise training combined with noninvasive ventilation improved 6-minute walk distance (Δ120m vs Δ45m) and reduced hospital stay (17 vs 39 days) compared to standard care (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does exercise training alone or combined with noninvasive ventilation improve functional capacity and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute systolic heart failure?
RCT (n=29)
Does exercise training alone or combined with noninvasive ventilation improve functional capacity and clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with acute systolic heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 120% vs 45%
p-value: p=< 0.05
In patients hospitalized for acute heart failure, early exercise training combined with noninvasive ventilation is safe, improves functional capacity, and reduces length of hospital stay.
Supports early combined exercise+NIV in acute HF admissions; extends inpatient rehab evidence to improve capacity and shorten stay.
BACKGROUND: Exercise training (ET) improves functional capacity in chronic heart failure (HF). However, ET effects in acute HF are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of ET alone or combined with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) compared with standard medical treatment during hospitalization in acute HF patients. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (systolic HF) were randomized into three groups: control (Control - only standard medical treatment); ET with placebo NIV (ET+Sham) and ET+NIV (NIV with 14 and 8 cmH2O of inspiratory and expiratory pressure, respectively). The 6MWT was performed on day 1 and day 10 of hospitalization and the ET was performed on an unloaded cycle ergometer until patients' tolerance limit (20 min or less) for eight consecutive days. For all analyses, statistical significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05). RESULTS: None of the patients in either exercise groups had adverse events or required exercise interruption. The 6MWT distance was greater in ET+NIV (Δ120 ± 72 m) than in ET+Sham (Δ73 ± 26 m) and Control (Δ45 ± 32 m; p < 0.05). Total exercise time was greater (128 ± 10 vs. 92 ± 8 min; p < 0.05) and dyspnea was lower (3 ± 1 vs. 4 ± 1; p < 0.05) in ET+NIV than ET+Sham. The ET+NIV group had a shorter hospital stay (17 ± 10 days) than ET+Sham (23 ± 8 days) and Control (39 ± 15 days) groups (p < 0.05). Total exercise time in ET+Sham and ET+NIV had significant correlation with length of hospital stay (r = -0.75; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Exercise training in acute HF was safe, had no adverse events and, when combined with NIV, improved 6MWT and reduce dyspnea and length of stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in Acute Heart Failure (n=29). Aerobic exercise training with noninvasive ventilation (ET+NIV) vs. Standard medical treatment (Control) and Exercise training with Sham NIV was evaluated on Change in 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance (p=< 0.05). Aerobic exercise training combined with noninvasive ventilation improved 6-minute walk distance (Δ120m vs Δ45m) and reduced hospital stay (17 vs 39 days) compared to standard care (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: