Key result
Iloprost infusion significantly increased absolute claudication distance from 151 to 210 meters (p<0.05) compared to placebo in patients with peripheral arterial insufficiency.
Why the study?
Does iloprost improve walking capacity in patients with peripheral arterial insufficiency?
Does iloprost improve walking capacity in patients with peripheral arterial insufficiency?
Absolute Event Rate: 210% vs 151%
p-value: p=<0.05
Intravenous iloprost significantly improves walking distance and ankle-brachial index in patients with stage II peripheral arterial insufficiency.
Should not change practice in peripheral arterial insufficiency; leaves open iloprost efficacy pending randomized trials.
The efficacy, tolerance and safety of iloprost, a stable analogue of carbaprostacyclin, were evaluated in 7 patients with peripheral arterial insufficiency at stage II of Fontaine's classification. After washout, placebo was infused intravenously for seven days, then iloprost was given by a six-hour intravenous infusion of 1 ng/kg/min over the next seven days. At the end of each period, the initial (ICD) and the absolute (ACD) claudication distance were measured by treadmill. The ankle/arm systolic blood pressure ratio (WI) was also assessed, at rest and ten minutes after exercise. As compared with placebo, ICD increased from 98 +/- 60 to 137 +/- 91 meters (p less than 0.05) and ACD from 151 +/- 76 to 210 +/- 95 meters (p less than 0.05). Similarly, WI rose from 0.44 +/- 0.14 to 0.52 +/- 0.18 (p less than 0.05) at rest and from 0.40 +/- 0.13 to 0.48 +/- 0.20 (p less than 0.05) ten minutes after treadmill exercise. Owing to the spontaneous fluctuation in walking distance experienced by such patients, an increase in ACD greater than or equal to 50% was considered as clinically relevant. In 3 patients, who experienced such an improvement, iloprost continued to be infused at the same dosage as before, for an additional seven days. In the remaining 4 patients (nonresponders), the dose was increased to 2 ng/kg/min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brevetti et al. (1989) studied Peripheral arterial insufficiency (n=7). Iloprost vs. Placebo was evaluated on Absolute claudication distance (ACD) in meters (p=<0.05). Iloprost infusion significantly increased absolute claudication distance from 151 to 210 meters (p<0.05) compared to placebo in patients with peripheral arterial insufficiency.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: