Key result
A 7-day schedule of iloprost (up to 1.5 ng/kg/min for 16 hours/day) provided similar improvements in plethysmographic parameters, exercise tolerance, and rest pain as a standard 28-day schedule.
Why the study?
Does a 7-day iloprost infusion regimen improve hemodynamics, peripheral blood flow, and exercise tolerance similarly to a 28-day regimen in patients with Fontaine stage III peripheral arterial disease?
RCT (n=20)
Does a 7-day iloprost infusion regimen improve hemodynamics, peripheral blood flow, and exercise tolerance similarly to a 28-day regimen in patients with Fontaine stage III peripheral arterial disease?
A shorter 7-day iloprost infusion regimen appears to provide similar therapeutic benefits to the standard 28-day regimen in patients with Fontaine stage III peripheral arterial disease, potentially improving patient comfort and reducing costs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports shorter 7-day iloprost regimens in Fontaine III PAD; confirms similar efficacy to 28-day treatment in this RCT.
Twenty patients, 15 males and 5 females, aged 50–71 years, with peripheral obstructive arterial disease at Fontaine stage III and requiring hospitalization, were randomized to two different iloprost treatment schedules: iloprost i.v. infusion, up to 2 ng/kg/minute for 6 hours/day for 28 days (Group A) or iloprost i.v. infusion, up to 1.5 ng/kg/minute, for 16 hours/day for 7 days (Group B). At baseline, after 7 days (end of treatment, Group B only) and after 28 days (end of study) the following measurements were done: blood pressure and heart rate, ankle/arm pressure index, first flow, peak flow, time to regression (by means of mercury strain-gauge plethysmography), stroke volume, cardiac output, ejection fraction (by means of 2D-echocardiography and echo-Doppler), exercise tolerance (by means of treadmill test), and rest pain (by means of visual analogue scale). Both treatment schedules resulted in significant improvement in plethysmographic parameters and exercise tolerance (both maximal and pain free) with concomitant reduction in rest pain. These effects were long lasting as evident by the results observed in Group B where the absolute data after 3 weeks of drug withdrawal were superimposable to those of Group A. On the contrary, only mild effects were evident on systemic hemodynamics, which tended to wane off as the infusion was stopped. From the results of this pilot study it is possible to conclude that treatment with iloprost at lower dosage (up to 1.5 ng/kg/minute) for 16 hour/day for 7 days, in patients at Fontaine stage III, seems to result in the same therapeutic benefits of the currently used schedule (up to 2 ng/kg/minute for 6 hour/day for 28 days). If confirmed by larger clinical experience, these data have clear implication in terms of patient comfort and cost containment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ceriello et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Peripheral obstructive arterial disease at Fontaine stage III (n=20). Iloprost vs. Iloprost up to 2 ng/kg/minute for 6 hours/day for 28 days was evaluated on Plethysmographic parameters, exercise tolerance, and rest pain. A 7-day schedule of iloprost (up to 1.5 ng/kg/min for 16 hours/day) provided similar improvements in plethysmographic parameters, exercise tolerance, and rest pain as a standard 28-day schedule.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: