Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal study finds 3D imaging accurately measures body dimensions in pregnant individuals, suggesting a viable alternative to traditional methods.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Maternal anthropometric changes are rapid during pregnancy and reflect increments in maternal and fetal tissues. These dynamic changes in body composition and shape during pregnancy are associated with maternal and fetal outcomes and are often monitored with simple tools such as a flexible tape for quantifying selected circumferences. The current study aim was to evaluate the hypothesis that circumferential measures of maternal body size and shape acquired with a 3D-optical imaging system will correlate, be accurate, and agree closely with ground-truth estimates made with a flexible tape by trained staff. SUBJECTS/METHODS: s), mean absolute errors (MAEs), root-mean square errors (RMSEs), concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs), and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Overall, associations between 3D and conventional anthropometric measurements were strong (univariate linear regression r values, 0.80-0.98; p's all <0.001) with good corresponding accuracy and agreement at all five anatomic sites (MAEs, -8.5 to 0.8 cm; RMSEs, 0.61-9.94 cm; CCCs 0.6-1.0; small significant (p < 0.05) bias was present at some sites/timepoints for some measures). Post hoc analyses revealed a potential basis for impact of advancing pregnancy on between-method differences. CONCLUSIONS: Strong associations, good accuracy, and close agreement with flexible tape circumference measurements, combined with feasible implementation, supports further development of 3D-optical technology as an alternative to conventional anthropometry for evaluating and monitoring body size, shape, and composition over the course of pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramirez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: