Abstract Despite decades of research on school leadership and instructional supervision, no study in the global literature has explicitly argued that the principal's core function — analogous to the teacher's core function of teaching — is to serve as the cognitive quality controller of classroom learning and assessment. This theoretical paper identifies and diagnoses a foundational conceptual gap: school systems worldwide have defined the principal's role through administrative and managerial competencies (EMASLIM framework; Permendiknas No. 13/2007), while supervision of instructional quality is treated as one of many coequal functions rather than the primary one. Drawing on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, instructional leadership theory, and systems thinking, we argue that this misalignment is the root cause of persistently low higher-order thinking skills (HOTS), literacy, and critical thinking outcomes among students — particularly in Indonesia and Southeast Asia. We further propose that effective supervision is impossible without the supervisor's mastery of cognitive leveling: the ability to read, classify, and give feedback on the cognitive demand of teachers' questions, tasks, and assessments across all subject disciplines. Finally, we introduce a 90-Day Cognitive Supervision Model — a falsifiable, low-cost intervention requiring no curriculum reform or additional budget — in which a cognitively competent principal conducting weekly clinical supervision cycles per teacher can produce measurable HOTS gains in students within 90 days and a self-sustaining quality culture within 180 days. This framework represents the first normative theoretical contribution in the global literature to position cognitive leveling mastery as a non-negotiable prerequisite for school principalship. Keywords: instructional supervision; cognitive leveling; higher-order thinking; principal competency; quality control; Bloom's taxonomy; 90-day intervention model
Deni Deni Samsudin Permana (Sat,) studied this question.