PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2010Heart169 citationsOpen Access

Anti-heart and anti-intercalated disk autoantibodies: evidence for autoimmunity in idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis

ACAlida L.P. CaforioABAntonio BrucatoADAndrea Doria

Key Result

Cross-reactive 1 anti-heart autoantibodies were found in 50% of IRAP patients compared to 4% in non-inflammatory cardiac disease controls (p=0.0001), supporting an autoimmune involvement.

Study Design

Type

Case-Control (n=611)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Are serum anti-heart and anti-intercalated-disk autoantibodies more frequent in patients with idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis compared to controls?

P
Population
40 consecutive patients with idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis (IRAP), 25 male, aged 37+/-16 years, from a single-centre cohort, and 571 control subjects (160 with non-inflammatory cardiac disease, 141 with ischaemic heart failure, 270 normal subjects).
I
Intervention
Detection of serum anti-heart (AHA), anti-intercalated-disk (AIDA) and non-cardiac-specific autoantibodies
C
Comparator
Control groups (non-inflammatory cardiac disease, ischaemic heart failure, normal subjects)
O
Outcome
Frequency of serum AHA, AIDA, and non-cardiac-specific autoantibodiessurrogate

The presence of anti-heart and anti-intercalated-disk autoantibodies in a majority of patients with idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis supports an autoimmune etiology for the disease.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 4%

p-value: p=0.0001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis (IRAP) is a rare disease of suspected, yet unproved, immune-mediated origin. The finding of serum heart-specific autoantibodies in IRAP would strengthen the autoimmune hypothesis and provide aetiology-specific non-invasive biomarkers. Objective To assess frequency of serum anti-heart (AHA), anti-intercalated-disk (AIDA) and non-cardiac-specific autoantibodies and their clinical and instrumental correlates in patients with IRAP. Patients 40 consecutive patients with IRAP, 25 male, aged 37+/-16 years, representing a large single-centre cohort collected at a referral centre over a long time period (median 5 years, range 1-22 years). Control groups included patients with non-inflammatory cardiac disease (NICD) (n=160), ischaemic heart failure (n=141) and normal subjects (n=270). METHODS: AHA (organ-specific, cross-reactive 1 and 2 types) and AIDA were detected in serum samples from patients, at last follow-up, and control subjects by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on human myocardium and skeletal muscle. Non-cardiac-specific autoantibodies were detected by IIF, and anti-Ro/SSA, anti-La/SSB by ELISA. RESULTS: The frequencies of cross-reactive 1 AHA and of AIDA were higher (50%; 25%) in IRAP than in NICD (4%; 4%), ischaemic (1%; 2%) or normal subjects (3%; 0%) (p=0.0001). AHA and/or AIDA were found in 67.5% patients with IRAP. Of the non-cardiac-specific antibodies, only antinuclear autoantibodies at titre > or =1/160 were more common in IRAP (5%) versus normal (0.5%, p<0.04). AIDA in IRAP were associated with a higher number of recurrences (p=0.01) and hospitalisations (p=0.0001), high titre (1/80 or higher) AHA with a higher number of recurrences (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The detection of AHA and of AIDA supports the involvement of autoimmunity in the majority of patients with IRAP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Caforio et al. (2010) conducted a case-control in Idiopathic recurrent acute pericarditis (IRAP) (n=611). Serum anti-heart (AHA) and anti-intercalated-disk (AIDA) autoantibodies vs. Non-inflammatory cardiac disease, ischaemic heart failure, and normal subjects was evaluated on Frequency of cross-reactive 1 AHA (p=0.0001). Cross-reactive 1 anti-heart autoantibodies were found in 50% of IRAP patients compared to 4% in non-inflammatory cardiac disease controls (p=0.0001), supporting an autoimmune involvement.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a153bb65347fbb1739f71d7https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2009.187138
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper