Key result
Residual monomorphic VT inducibility after electrical storm ablation predicts ~6-fold higher mortality.
Why the study?
Electrical storm is associated with severe long-term outcomes, but the prognostic impact of radiofrequency catheter ablation assessed by aggressive programmed ventricular stimulation was unclear.
Does achieving non-inducibility of sustained monomorphic VT after RFCA reduce mortality and VT recurrences in patients with electrical storm?
Cohort (n=82)
No
Does achieving non-inducibility of sustained monomorphic VT after RFCA reduce mortality and VT recurrences in patients with electrical storm?
Effect estimate: HR 6.262 (95% CI 2.165-18.108)
p-value: p=0.001
Achieving non-inducibility of sustained monomorphic VT after ablation for electrical storm significantly improves survival and reduces VT recurrences.
Background: Electrical storm (ES) is defined by clustering episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and is associated with severe long-term outcomes. We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in ES as assessed by aggressive programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS). Methods: Single-center retrospective longitudinal study with 82 consecutive ES patients referred for RFCA with a median follow-up (IQR 25−75%) of 45.43 months (15−69.86). All-cause mortality and VT recurrences were assessed in relation to RFCA outcomes defined by 4-extrastimuli PVS: Class 1—no ventricular arrhythmia; Class 2—no sustained monomorphic VTs (mVT) inducible, but non-sustained mVTs, polymorphic VTs, or VF inducible; Class 3—clinical VT non-inducible, other sustained mVTs inducible; and Class 4—clinical VT inducible. Results: Class 1, Class 2, Class 3, and Class 4 were achieved in 56.1%, 13.4%, 23.2%, and 7.4% of cases, respectively. The combined outcome of Class 1 + Class 2 (no sustained monomorphic VT inducible) led to improved survival (log-rank p < 0.001) and reduced VT recurrence (log-rank p < 0.001). Residual monomorphic VT inducibility (HR 6.262 (95% CI: 2.165−18.108, p = 0.001), NYHA IV heart failure symptoms (HR 20.519 (95% CI: 1.623−259.345), p = 0.02)), and age (HR 1.009 (95% CI: 1.041−1.160), p = 0.001)) independently predicted death during follow-up. LVEF was not predictive of death (HR 1.003 (95% CI: 0.946−1.063) or recurrences (HR 0.988 (95% CI: 0.955−1.021)). Conclusions: Non-inducibility for sustained mVTs after aggressive PVS post-RFCA leads to improved survival in ES, independently of LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vătăşescu et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Electrical storm (ES) (n=82). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) with aggressive programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) vs. Residual monomorphic VT inducibility vs non-inducibility was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 6.262, 95% CI 2.165-18.108, p=0.001). Residual monomorphic VT inducibility after electrical storm ablation independently predicted death during follow-up (HR 6.262; 95% CI 2.165-18.108; p=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: