Key result
Pharmacy-led heart failure transition of care significantly decreased the 30-day readmission rate compared to standard care (10.5% vs 17.3%; OR 0.578; 95% CI 0.367-0.911; P=0.018).
Why the study?
Heart failure transition of care programs may improve continuity and coordination of care and decrease readmissions, but the impact of pharmacy-led programs required evaluation.
Does pharmacy-led heart failure transition of care reduce 30-day heart failure readmission rates in patients hospitalized with a primary HF diagnosis?
Observational (n=663)
No
Does pharmacy-led heart failure transition of care reduce 30-day heart failure readmission rates in patients hospitalized with a primary HF diagnosis?
Effect estimate: OR 0.578 (95% CI 0.367-0.911)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.5% vs 17.3%
p-value: p=0.018
Pharmacy-led transition of care, including medication reconciliation and patient education, significantly reduces 30-day readmission rates for patients hospitalized with heart failure.
Supports pharmacy-led HF transitions; extends observational data but leaves randomized confirmation open.
Background: Heart failure (HF) transition of care (TOC) programs may improve continuity of care and coordination and decrease hospital readmissions. Objective: This study evaluated the impact of pharmacy-led HF TOC on HF readmission rate. Methods: This was a single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study. Pharmacy TOC comprised admission and discharge medication reconciliations and patient education. Patients were included if they had a primary HF diagnosis. Patients were excluded if they were admitted for a non-HF diagnosis, admitted for <24 hours, had a stage IV cancer or dementia diagnosis, or were transferred to hospice care. The primary outcome was HF 30-day readmission rate. Results: A total of 663 patients were included in the study: 330 in the control group and 333 in the intervention group. The average age for both groups was 67 ± 16 years; 48.1% were female; 56.9% were African American; and 51.4% of patients had an ejection fraction ≤40%. In the control group, 57 (17.3%) patients had a HF 30-day readmission compared with 35 (10.5%) patients in the intervention group. After adjusting for age, the intervention group continued to show a difference in readmission (odds ratio = 0.578; 95% CI = 0.367-0.911; P = 0.018). The most common interventions were medication addition (11%), dose titration (7.5%), medication discontinuation (6.6%), and duplication avoidance (2.7%). Conclusion and Relevance: Pharmacy-led HF TOC, as a component of a targeted hospital-based initiative, significantly decreased HF 30-day readmission rate. Results from this study warrant further research to explore which interventions in TOC are most effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=663). Pharmacy-led transition of care (medication reconciliation and patient education) vs. Control group (standard care) was evaluated on Heart failure 30-day readmission rate (OR 0.578, 95% CI 0.367-0.911, p=0.018). Pharmacy-led heart failure transition of care significantly decreased the 30-day readmission rate compared to standard care (10.5% vs 17.3%; OR 0.578; 95% CI 0.367-0.911; P=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: