Key result
Higher symptom burden linked to ~10% greater HF readmission and mortality risk per 5-point increase.
Why the study?
This study was performed to investigate the prognostic value of assessing symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in older patients with heart failure.
Does symptom burden assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at hospital discharge predict the combined event of heart failure readmission and all-cause mortality in older patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=306)
No
Does symptom burden assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at hospital discharge predict the combined event of heart failure readmission and all-cause mortality in older patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: HR 1.10 (95% CI 1.04-1.17)
p-value: p=<0.001
Comprehensive assessment of symptom burden using the ESAS at hospital discharge provides significant prognostic information beyond conventional risk factors for predicting readmission and mortality in older patients with heart failure.
ESAS symptom assessment at discharge may aid risk stratification in older HF patients; leaves open whether symptom-directed interventions improve outcomes.
This study was performed to investigate the prognostic value of assessing symptom burden using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) in older patients with Heart Failure (HF). This prospective cohort study was performed in consecutive patients ≥ 60 years old hospitalized with HF at a university hospital between September 2020 and June 2023. ESAS was used to assess nine common symptoms at hospital discharge (total score: 0-90) with higher scores indicating greater severity. The primary outcome was the combined event of HF readmission and all-cause mortality within 6 months. The median ESAS sum score in the study population consisting of 306 patients (median age, 79 years; 54.9% male) was 13 points. The commonly reported moderate-to-severe symptoms were impaired well-being (34.9%), anxiety (27.5%), drowsiness (25.8%), tiredness (24.9%), and depression (22.2%). In multivariate analyses, ESAS sum score was significantly associated with the combined event (adjusted hazard ratio for each 5-point increase, 1.10 (95% confidence interval: 1.04-1.17; p < 0.001). Inclusion of ESAS sum score in the risk model significantly increased both continuous net reclassification improvement (p = 0.028) and integrated discrimination improvement (p = 0.002) for the primary outcome. Comprehensive assessment of symptom burden with ESAS provided additional prognostic information to conventional risk factors in older patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure (n=306). Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) score vs. Lower ESAS score was evaluated on Combined event of heart failure readmission and all-cause mortality within 6 months (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, p=<0.001). Higher symptom burden assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System was significantly associated with an increased risk of heart failure readmission and all-cause mortality (HR 1.10 per 5-point increase).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: